+Vinod+Rai+s+speech+at+Harvard+Kennedy+School.jpg)
SHABNAM HASHMI
23, CANNING LANE, NEW DELHI-110001
EMAIL: shabnamhashmi@gmail.com
January 2, 2013
 |
| Shabnam Hashmi: Social Activist |
DCP PARLIAMENT STREET
PARLIAMENT STREET POLICE STATION
NEW DELHI
SUB: REGISTRATION OF CASE UNDER Section 153A
Dear Sir,
I am writing to you to draw your attention to the speech of Mr Akbaruddin Owaisi, given a few days ago. The speech is available on you tube and is being circulated on the facebook extensively.
This highly inflammatory speech made by Mr. Akbaruddin Owaisi of MIM and member of the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly was delivered on December 24, 2012 in Nirmal town of Andhra Pradesh.
The whole speech is highly objectionable, inflammatory against the Hindu religion and against our cultural heritage. It is a strong attack on the values of our constitution, democracy and secular values. Such obnoxious speeches divide society, vitiate peace and lead to conflicts and riots.
I request you to immediately register a case against Mr Akbarudddin Owaisi under section 153 A of the IPC. I request you to take exemplary action in this very serious matter to ensure that such intolerable acts are never repeated again, anywhere by anyone and secure peace and harmony in the country.
This speech falls under this section as it has clearly causing enmity between different groups on grounds of religion and is causing a threat to communal harmony.
Yours sincerely
Shabnam Hashmi
------------------------------
Indian Penal Code (IPC)
Section 153A. Promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc., and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony
1[153A. Promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc., and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony.—(1) Whoever—
(a) By words, either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representations or otherwise, promotes or attempts to promote, on grounds of religion, race, place or birth, residence, language, caste or community or any other ground whatsoever, disharmony or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, or
(b) Commits any act which is prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, and which disturbs or is likely to disturb the public tranquility, 2[or]
2[(c) Organizes any exercise, movement, drill or other similar activity intending that the participants in such activity shall use or be trained to use criminal force or violence of knowing it to be likely that the participants in such activity will use or be trained to use criminal force or violence, or participates in such activity intending to use or be trained to use criminal force or violence or knowing it to be likely that the participants in such activity will use or be trained to use criminal force or violence, against any religious, racial, language or regional group or caste or community and such activity for any reason whatsoever causes or is likely to cause fear or alarm or a feeling of insecurity amongst members of such religious, racial, language or regional group or caste or community,]
Shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.
Offence committed in place of worship, etc.— (2) Whoever commits an offence specified in sub-section (1) in any place of worship or in any assembly engaged in the performance of religious worship or religious ceremonies, shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to five years and shall also be liable to fine.]
CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENCE
Para I
Punishment—Imprisonment for 3 years, or fine, or both—Cognizable—Non-bailable—T
Para II
Punishment—Imprisonment for 5 years and fine—Cognizable—Non-bailable—T
13 comments:
Today many diseases can be treated by a very fine, hair thin,
disposable acupuncture needles which are made up of
either stainless steel or silver or gold or copper.
Some schools even require gaining experience first as a prerequisite in your application to the university.
Physical therapist or physiotherapist is a really captivating career in the field of
medicine.
Also visit my web blog http://Roxacuuk.ucoz.com/
Akbaruddin is the 1st and only original thinker of Hindoosthan ! He was the man who identified the worth of Rama as an impotent gay pansy who pimped and whored his wife !
Allah love him and so gave him that rare blend of genius,grit and courage
Rama told Sita to whore herself- this is in the Valmiki Ramayana
https://dindooohindoo.page.tl/Rama-Tells-Sita-to-whore-herself.htm
Chapter [Sarga] 115
तद्गच्छ त्वानुजानेऽद्य यथेष्टं जनकात्मजे |
एता दश दिशो भद्रे कार्यमस्ति न मे त्वया || ६-११५-१८
“O Seetha! That is why, I am permitting you now. Go wherever you like. All these ten directions are open to you, my dear lady! There is no work to be done to me, by you.”
तदद्य व्याहृतं भद्रे मयैतत् कृतबुद्धिना |
लक्ष्मणे वाथ भरते कुरु बुद्धिं यथासुखम् || ६-११५-२२
“O gracious lady! Therefore, this has been spoken by me today, with a resolved mind. Set you mind on Lakshmana or Bharata, as per your ease.”
įatrughne vätha sugréve räkņase vä vibhéņaëe |
niveįaya manaų séte yathä vä sukhamätmanaų || 6-115-23
“O Seetha! Otherwise, set your mind either on Shatrughna or on Sugreeva or on Vibhishana the demon; or according to your own comfort.”
Sita called Rama an Impotent Pansy
https://dindooohindoo.page.tl/Sita-says-Rama-is-Impotent-Pansy.htm
Book II : Ayodhya Kanda – Book Of Ayodhya Chapter[Sarga] 30
किम् त्वा अमन्यत वैदेहः पिता मे मिथिला अधिपः | राम जामातरम् प्राप्य स्त्रियम् पुरुष विग्रहम् || २-३०-३
“What my father, the king of Mithila belonging to the country of Videha, think of himself having got as so-in-law you, a woman having the form of a man?”
Akbaruddin is the 1st and only original thinker of Hindoosthan ! He was the man who identified the worth of Hanooman as a sexual deviant and the gay lover of Rama !
Allah loves him and so gave him that rare blend of genius,grit and courage - which is severely lacking among Muslims of India
WAS HANOOOMAN THE BANDAR RAMA'S GAY PARTNER IN JUNGLES WHILE SWINGING ON TREES !
HOW ELSE WOULD BANDAR HANOOMAN KNOW THAT RAMA HAD A SMALL LITTLE PENIS ? dindooohindoo
Book V : Sundara Kanda - Book Of Beauty
Chapter [Sarga] 35
18."He has three folds in the skin of his neck and belly. He is depressed at three places (viz. the middle of his soles, the lines on his soles and the nipples). He is undersized at four places (viz. the neck, membran virile, the back and the shanks). He is endowed with three spirals in the hair of his head.
COGITO !
AS PER RAMAYANA -- THE HANOOMAN THE APE WAS GIVEN 16 SEX SLAVES BY BHARAT !
Book VI : Yuddha Kanda - Book Of War
Chapter [Sarga] 125
43-45
"O the gentle one! Are you a divine being or a human being, who have come here out of compassion? To you, who have given this agreeable news to me, I shall give in return, for the pleasant tidings, a hundred thousand cows, a hundred best villages, and for wives, sixteen golden complexioned virgin girls of a good conduct, decked with ear-rings, having beautiful noses and thighs, adorned with all kinds of jewels, with charming countenances as delightful as the moon and born in a noble family."
Y DID BHARAT GIVE 16 SEX SLAVES TO THE APE ?
THE PAWAN PUTTAR BRAHMA CHARI !
Akbar is the man !
Akbaruddin says that Hindoos are an impotent race of a modest size ! Bang on ! Y ?
It is simple !
The Factoid ! dindooohindoo
Hindooosthan is the Impotentica Capital of the world !
https://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/india-is-the-impotence-capital-of-the-world/239548
People ask Y ?
It is simple !
Hindoos are the sons of Rama ! Rama was an Impotent Gay Pansy – as per Seeta !
And the proof is the limpdick of Rama !
This is Hanooman describing the UNDERSIZED LIMPDICK VIRILE MEMBRANE OF RAMA ! (Don’t ask how did Hanooman know)
Book V : Sundara Kanda – Book Of Beauty
Chapter [Sarga] 35
18.
“He has three folds in the skin of his neck and belly. He is depressed at three places (viz. the middle of his soles, the lines on his soles and the nipples).
He is undersized at four places (viz. the neck, membran virile, the back and the shanks). He is endowed with three spirals in the hair of his head.
IT IS ALL THE GENIUS OF RAMA !
People say Akbaruddin abused Rama's mother !
What is wrong with that ? As per the Ramayana - Rama's mommy had sex with a horse !
Rama;s mother had sex with a Horse !
https://dindooohindoo.page.tl/Kaushalya-has-sex-with-a-Live-Horse.htm
Book I : Bala Kanda – The Youthful Majesties
Chapter [Sarga] 14
Queen Kausalya desiring the results of ritual disconcertedly resided one night with that horse that flew away like a bird. [1-14-34]
AKBARUDDIN SAYS THAT RAMA WAS A GAY APE ! THIS IS THE DIVINE GENIUS OF AKBARUDDIN !
Was Rama a Gay Monkey ?
https://dindooohindoo.page.tl/Is-Rama-a-Gay-Monkey–f-.htm
Book VI : Yuddha Kanda – Book Of War
Chapter [Sarga] 128
आजानुलम्बिबाहुश्च महास्कन्धः प्रतापवान् |
लक्ष्मणानुचरो रामः पृथिवीमन्वपालयत् || ६-१२८-९७
That Rama, having his long arms reaching down his knees, having a broad chest and glorious, ruled this earth with Lakshmana as his companion.
No humans has arms reaching to the knees ! Is Rama an Ape ?
Rama ruled for 10000 years with Lakshmana – as HIS COMPANION ? What about Seeta Maiya ? What do have here ? A Gay Monkey !
Rama spent 12 years with Lakshmana and Apes, with no sex with a woman – so he became Gay –so what – it is all evolution !
As per Ramayana – Rama ruled happily ever after for 1000 years, with Lakshmana by his side (not Seeta) – it is all the Gay Thing (although Uttarakandam says that Rama and Seeta made merry for 10000 years – as miya bibi – but that was to neuter the Gay Theory of the Valmiki Ramayana)
Also, the Ramayana says that Rama had hands till his knees, and that explains his love and fondness for all apes and monkeys
Rama the Limpdick spent 12 years with Lakshmana, in a jungle, with no sex – and was sexually frustrated , and then Vali was banging his brother’s wife – and so, Rama the Limpdick killed Vali – it is all OK La !
IT IS ALL THE GENIUS OF AKBARUDDIN !
Hindus say that Akbaruddin called Seeta a Harlot !
Wrong ! Seeta was a Nepali whore ! This is EVIDENT in the Ramayana ! dindooohindoo
Ravana dressed as a Brahmin meets Seeta Maiya for the 1st time ! How does he address her ?
This is proof that Seeta was Nepali Whore with Nil IQ who got no sexual or romantic attention from Limpdick Rama ! Is this the way a Brahmin talks ? I present “Romancing the Stone” Ravana style !
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/aranya/sarga46/aranya_46_frame.htm
vishaalam jaghanam piinam uuruu kari kara upamau | etau upacitau vR^ittau sa.mhatau sa.mpragalbhitau || 3-46-19 piina unnata mukhau kaantau snigdha taala phala upamau | maNi praveka aabharaNau rucirau te payo dharau || 3-46-20
“Your hips are beamy, thighs burly akin to elephant’s trunks, and these two breasts of yours that are ornamented with best jewellery are rotund, rubbing and bumping each other, and they are swinging up and up, their nipples are brawny and jutting out, and they are smoothish like palm-fruits, thus they are covetable for they are beautiful.
[3-46-19, 20] caaru smite caaru dati caaru netre vilaasini | mano harasi me raame nadii kuulam iva a.mbhasaa || 3-46-21 karaantamita madhyaa asi sukeshii sa.mhata stanii |
“Oh, allurer, your smile is alluring, teeth are alluring, and your eyes allure, oh, beauty, your waist is palmful, your hair velvety, your breasts are jostling, and you rob my soul as a spate robs riverbank. [3-46-21, 22a]
IS THIS A WAY A BRAHMIN ADDRESSES A PIOUS WOMAN ? OR IS THIS IS THE WAY YOU ADDRESS A WHORE !
AKBARUDDIN KNEW IT ALL ALONG !
Akbaruddin says that Seeta was frustrated dimwit harlot ! Nothing could be more true than that !
It is all in the Ramayana !
Proof that "Seeta Is not Seeta Maiya" - just "a fat,cow teated,stupid harlot"
This is a "conversation from the Sundara Kandam" ! dindooohindoo
There is proof in the Ramayana that Seeta was a fat,stupid Nepali Harlot !
It will prove that Seeta was a "fat,cow teated,stupid harlot", who "could not see or sense", the divine powers of Monkey Boy Hanooman.She was just a "Simple Nepali Harlot toilet cleaer/dishwasher"
Also,a moot point - is ,Y did "she not want to go back to her limpet limpdick husband Rama" ?
Could it be that she was "enjoying her sex life and sexual attention",from Ravana ?
Sample 1 - Seeta Maiya "cannot see", that "Hanooman is no ordinary ape"
http://englishvalmikiramayanam.blogspot.in/2013/10/sundara-kandam-36-46.html
Hey monkey who is the army-commander in chief of the monkeys, the fact of your desire to carry me through this very long route makes me feel that it is your monkey like conduct.” 37. 29
“Hey Chief of monkeys, how do you propose to take me from her to the presence of my husband with the frail body of yours?” 37. 30
Sample 2 - Hanooman tells Seeta Maiya"not to talk like a dumb nepali harlot"
http://englishvalmikiramayanam.blogspot.in/2013/10/sundara-kandam-36-46.html
“I have sufficient strength to carry this city of Lanka along with its mountains, forests , buildings, spires , towers and also its chief.” 37.37
“So, Hey Vaidehi, make your brain stable, leave out all doubts. Hey lady and make Rama along with Lakshmana devoid of all sorrows.” 37.38
Sample 3 - Finally Harlot Seeta Maiya tells Monkey Boy that "she can"t fly - as she has a fear of heights"
http://englishvalmikiramayanam.blogspot.in/2013/10/sundara-kandam-36-46.html
“Hey chief of monkeys, it is not possible for me to accompany you for I may faint by the great speed by which you go.” 37.43
“I may perhaps fall down because of trembling induced by fear from your back when you are traveling in the sky far -far above the ocean.” 37. 44
“I would then perhaps fall and die in the ocean and become good food for beings like whales and crocodiles living in the sea.” 37.45
Sample 4 - All the above is after Ravana has told Harlot Seeta, that he will "do her - doggy style,in 2 months" (Oooooooh ! That is Y she did not leave !)
http://englishvalmikiramayanam.blogspot.in/2013/10/sundara-kandam-10-25_27.html
After telling the daughter of Videha these words, "he became very angry and further told her",the following:-
“Hey pretty one, who cannot be adequately described, the remaining period of safety that I have set to you are only two months and so you better climb in my bed to sleep with me.” 22.8
“If you do not accept me as your husband after two months, my cooks will cut you in to pieces for my breakfast.” 22.9
THE GENIUS OF AKBARUDDIN IS LIKE THE OCEAN !
The Proof that Seeta Maiya went willingly with Ravana as she was a lonely and sexually frustrated Nepali whore.dindooohindoo
The fact that Rama was an impotent limpdick and a gay pansy,is undisputable - so we leave that at this stage
PART 1
1st let us settle the matter that Seeta was a lonely,frustrated Nepali whore
Book III : Aranya Kanda - The Forest Trek
Chapter [Sarga] 53
ईदृशम् गर्हितम् कर्म कथम् कृत्वा न लज्जसे |
स्त्रियाः च हरणम् नीच रहिते च परस्य च || ३-५३-७
"A woman, that too a lonely one, that too the other man's wife, that too an abduction, but not winning or wooing her... you knave, on your undertaking such a kind of deplorable deed, how unashamed are you? [3-53-7]
Note - SEETA MAIYA DID NOT SAY THAT SHE WAS ALONE.SHE SAID SHE WAS LONELY
PART 2
It is said that if Ravana touched any woman with intent of lust, he would die
Let us 1st prove that the Ravana touched Seeta with intent of lust.He described Seeta's breats and nipples etc. - but that is passe,as that is just vocabulary
There is specific reference in the Ramayana that RAVANA TOUCHED SITA MAIYA WITH INTENT OF LUST
Book III : Aranya Kanda - The Forest Trek
Chapter [Sarga] 49
Ravana who is "infatuated with lust" picked her up, which lady is disinclined for any kind of sensuality and who is verily writhing like the wife of King Cobra, and then he surged skyward and flew off with her in his air-chariot. [3-49-22]
ताम् अकामाम् स काम आर्तः पन्नग इन्द्र वधूम् इव |
विवेष्टमानाम् आदाय उत्पपात अथ रावणः || ३-४९-२२
Then people say that Ravana DID NOT TOUCH THE BODY OF SEETA MAIYA ! Lies
This is proof that Ravana touched her body,waist and naked thighs
Book III : Aranya Kanda - The Forest Trek
Chapter [Sarga] 49
वामेन सीताम् पद्माक्षीम् मूर्धजेषु करेण सः |
ऊर्वोः तु दक्षिणेन एव परिजग्राह पाणिना || ३-४९-१७
He that Ravana grabbed the lotus-eyed Seetha on lifting her up with his left hand at her plait of hair at nape, and with his right hand at her thighs. [3-49-17]
ततः ताम् परुषैः वाक्यैः अभितर्ज्य महास्वनः |
अंकेन आदाय वैदेहीम् रथम् आरोपयत् तदा || ३-४९-२०
Then he whose voice is strident that Ravana lifted her up by her waist and got Vaidehi up on the air-chariot intimidating her with bitter words. [3-49-20]
AND RAVANA DID NOT DIE !
WHICH MEANS THAT SEETA MAIYA WENT WITH RAVANA WILLINGLY AS SHE WAS SEDUCED BY HIM !
SEETA MAIYA MIGHT HAVE HAD AFTER THOUGHTS ! BUT SHE WENT WITH RAVANA WILLINGLY - PERHAPS UNDER SEDUCTION OR HYPNOTISM - BUT THE NEPALI RANDI SEETA WENT WILLINGLY WITH RAVANA
This is proof that Rama and Lakshman are impotent limpdicks who could not even sense or hear Seeta Maiaya's
pangs and wailings.The poor nepali randi had to plead to TREES,BIRDS,RIVERS ! But none came to help the nepali randi
This is the state of the Godliness of Impotentica Rama and Lakshmana.These Hindoo Gods could not sense that their
woman was giving a blow job to Ravana - until the monkeys told them ! dindooohindoo
Book III : Aranya Kanda - The Forest Trek
Chapter [Sarga] 49
हा लक्ष्मण महाबाहो गुरु चित्त प्रसादक |
ह्रियमाणाम् न जानीषे रक्षसा काम रूपिणा || ३-४९-२४
"Haa, greatly dextrous Lakshmana... oh, rejoicer of your mentor... you are incognisant of me who am being abducted by this demon who is a dissembler. [3-49-24]
जीवितम् सुखम् अर्थाम् च धर्म हेतोः परित्यजन् |
ह्रियमाणाम् अधर्मेण माम् राघव न पश्यसि || ३-४९-२५
"Oh, Raghava, you have relinquished your high-life, happiness, and riches for the sake of righteousness, and though you avowed to protect your observants, you are unobservant of me who am being abducted by the unrighteousness itself. [3-49-5]
ननु नाम अविनीतानाम् विनेता असि परंतप |
कथम् एवम् विधम् पापम् न त्वम् शास्सि हि रावणम् || ३-४९-२६
"Oh, enemy-inflamer Rama, I reckon that you are an absolute controller of uncontrollable beings, I wonder why you are not controlling this kind of sinner, Ravana, indeed?" This is how Seetha started her cry in wilderness. [3-49-26]
आमंत्रये जनस्थानम् कर्णिकारान् च पुष्पितान् |
क्षिप्रम् रामाय शंसध्वम् सीताम् हरति रावणः || ३-४९-३०
"I call the attention of the flowered Karnikaara trees of Janasthaana, you inform Rama that Ravana is thieving Seetha." Thus, she is addressing the woods and others on the ground from air-chariot. [3-49-30]
हंस सारस संघुष्टाम् वन्दे गोदावरीम् नदीम् |
क्षिप्रम् रामाय शंस त्वम् सीताम् हरति रावणः || ३-४९-३१
"I pray you who are with the bustle of swans and saarasa water birds, oh, River Godavari, you promptly tell Rama that Ravana is thieving Seetha. [3-49-31]
दैवतानि च यान्ति अस्मिन् वने विविध पादपे |
नमस्करोमि अहम् तेभ्यो भर्तुः शंसत माम् हृताम् || ३-४९-३२
"I also venerate you, the sylvan deities that travel in this forest with diverse trees or, those that abide on the treetops, you may please inform my husband that I am being stolen. [3-49-32]
यानि कानिचित् अपि अत्र सत्त्वानि निवसन्ति उत |
सर्वाणि शरणम् यामि मृग पक्षि गणान् अपि || ३-४९-३३
"Or, over there, some few beings that are living over there on the ground below, I seek shelter of all the flocks of birds and hoards of animals, and I pray you to convey this news. [3-49-33]
Y WAS RAMA A LIMPET LIMPDICK COWARD WEASEL
CASE 1 - HE WAS BORN BY HIS LIMPDICK FATHER WHEN DASHRATH WAS 6000 YEARS OLD
Book I : Bala Kanda - The Youthful Majesties
Chapter [Sarga] 20
षष्टिर्वर्षसहस्राणि जातस्य मम कौशिक || १-२०-१०
कृच्छ्रेणोत्पादितश्चायं न रामं नेतुमर्हसि |
10b, 11a. koushika = oh Vishvamitra; jaatasya mama = birthed, for me [from my birth]; SaSTiH varSasahasraaNi = sixty thousand years [passed] ; ayam = this one [Rama]; kR^icChreNa = with tribulations; utpaaditaH cha = is produced given birth, also; raamam netum na arhasi = unapt of you to take Rama with you.
"Sixty thousand years have passed from my birth, oh! Vishvamitra, and this Rama is engendered at this age, that too with tribulations, hence taking Rama with you will be inappropriate of you. [1-20-10b, 11a]
CASE 2 - RAMAS MOMMY WAS NOT "IMPERGNATED BY DASHRATH" ! WHOSE SON WAS RAMA THE LIMPDICK.dindooohindoo
Book I : Bala Kanda - The Youthful Majesties
Chapter [Sarga] 16
ततस्तु ताः प्राश्य तदुत्तमस्त्रियो
महीपतेरुत्तमपायसं पृथक् |
हुताशनादित्यसमानतेजसोऽ-
चिरेण गर्भान् प्रतिपेदिरे तदा || १-१६-३१
31. mahiipateH tataH uttamastriyaH = those best ladies of king; tat uttamapaayasam = that, best dessert; praashya = on consuming; hutaashanaadityasamaanatejasaH = equalling Fire and Sun in resplendence [queens]; achireNa tadaa garbhaan pratipedire = then very soon they got - conceived.
Then on consuming dessert those best ladies of the king whose resplendence then vied with that Fire and Sun became pregnant after some time. [1-16-31]
PROOF THAT SEETA WAS A NEPALI RANDI
CASE 1 - RAVANA TALKING TO SEETA
Book III : Aranya Kanda - The Forest Trek
Chapter [Sarga] 49
राज्यात् च्युतम् असिद्ध अर्थम् रामम् परिमित आयुषम् || ३-४९-१३
कैः गुणैः अनुरक्ता असि मूढे पण्डित मानिनि |
यः स्त्रिया वचनात् राज्यम् विहाय ससुहृत् जनम् || ३-४९-१४
अस्मिन् व्याल अनुचरिते वने वसति दुर्मतिः |
13b, 14, 15a. muuDhe = oh, unintelligent lady; paNDita maanini = highly intelligent, deem your self; dur matiH = bad, minded [mindless Rama]; yaH striyaa vacanaat = who, by a woman's, word; sa = along with; su hR^it janam = good, hearted, people; raajyam vihaaya = kingdom, on leaving off; vyaala anucarite = predators, moving in [on prowl]; asmin vane vasati = in this, in forest, he who lives - Rama; such a; raajyaat cyutam = from kingdom, fallen [spurned off]; a siddha artham = not, gainful, his purposes; [maanuSaH = being human]; parimita aayuSam = he is with - limited, longevity - short-lived human being; raamam = at Rama; kaiH guNaiH anuraktaa asi = by what, merits [of Rama,] impassioned [for him,] you are.
"Oh, halfwitted lady, you who deem yourself a highly intellectual lady, listen, that mindless Rama who just by a word of a woman forebode kingdom along with all of his amiable people, and lives in this forest where the predators are on the prowl, thus he who is spurned off from kingdom, ungainful are his purposes, and who is even a short-lived human, I wonder by what merits you are impassioned for such a Rama?" Thus Ravana spoke to Seetha. [3-49-13b, 14, 15a]
CASE2 - SEETA THINKS HER BODY IS TO BLAME FOR HER FATE.dindooohindoo
Yuddha Kanda - Book Of War
Chapter [Sarga] 48
स्तनौ च अविरलौ पीनौ मम इमौ मग्न चूचुकौ |
मग्ना च उत्सन्गिनी नाभिह् पार्श्व उरस्कम् च मे चितम् || ६-४८-११
11. maamakau = my; stanau = breasts; aviralau = are close to each other; piinau = fully developed; magna chuuchukau = and have depressed nipples; naabhiH = my navel; magnaa = is deeply; utsedhinii = indented; me = my; paarshvoraskamcha = flanks and bossom; chitam = are well-formed.
"My breasts are close to each other, fully developed and have depressed nipples. My navel is deeply idented. My flanks and bossom are well-formed."
What was life in the days of Rama the Limpdick ?
It was aine,venison,massage girls and orgiees,as per the Ramayana.dindooohindoo
Book II : Ayodhya Kanda - Book Of Ayodhya
Chapter 52
सुराघटसहस्रेण मांसभूतोदनेन च |
यक्ष्ये त्वाम् प्रयता देवि पुरीम् पुनरुपागता || २-५२-८९
Verse 89.
"Oh, goddess! After reaching back the city of Ayodhya, I shall worship you with thousand pots of spirituous liquor and jellied meat with cooked rice well prepared for the solemn rite."
Book II : Ayodhya Kanda - Book Of Ayodhya
Chapter 91
अन्याः स्रवन्तु मैरेयम् सुराम् अन्याः सुनिष्ठिताम् |
अपराः च उदकम् शीतम् इक्षु काण्ड रस उपमम् || २-९१-१५
Verse 15.
"Let some rivers flow with Maireya ( a kind of wine made from date palms etc) some others flow with highly refined spirituous liquor and some others flow with cool water with a taste of sugarcane."
सुराम् सुरापाः पिबत पायसम् च बुभुक्षिताः || २-९१-५२
मांसनि च सुमेध्यानि भक्ष्यन्ताम् यावद् इग्च्छथ || २-९१-५३
Verse 52; 53.
"O, wine-bibbers! Drink the wine, however much you desire! O troops stricken with hunger! Let milk thickened iwth rice and the meats which are very much fresh, be eaten (as you will)"
उत्साद्य स्नापयन्ति स्म नदी तीरेषु वल्गुषु |
अप्य् एकम् एकम् पुरुषम् प्रमदाः सत्प च अष्ट च || २-९१-५४
Verse 54.
Seven or eight young women bathed every single man on the beautiful river-banks, after massaging their body with oil.
सम्वहन्त्यः समापेतुर् नार्यो रुचिर लोचनाः |
परिमृज्य तथा न्यायम् पाययन्ति वर अन्गनाः || २-९१-५५
Verse 55.
Women with charming eyes came running and shampooed their limbs. Lovely women likewise wiped off the moisture on their body with towels and gave them beverages to drink, mutually sharing them among each other.
Book II : Ayodhya Kanda - Book Of Ayodhya
Chapter 96
तां तथा दर्शयित्वा तु मैथिलीं गिरिनिम्नगाम् |
निषसाद गिरिप्रस्थे सीतां मांसेन चन्दयन् || २-९६-१
Vere 1.
Having shown Mandakini River in that manner to Seetha, the daughter of Mithila, Rama set on the hill-side in order to gratify her appetite with a piece of flesh.
इदं मेध्यमिदं स्वादु निष्टप्तमिदमग्निना |
एवमास्ते स धर्मात्मा सीतया सह राघवः || २-९६-२
Verse 2.
Rama, whose mind was devoted to righteousness stayed there with Seetha, saying; "This meat is fresh, this is savoury and roasted in the fire."
Book II : Ayodhya Kanda - Book Of Ayodhya
Chapter 56
ऐणेयम् मांसम् आहृत्य शालाम् यक्ष्यामहे वयम् |
कर्त्व्यम् वास्तुशमनम् सौमित्रे चिरजीवभिः || २-५६-२२
Verse 22.
"Oh, Lakshmana! Bring the meat of an antelope. We shall perform a purifactory ceremony while entering the house. Which is to be done by those who wish to live long."
मृगम् हत्वाऽऽनय क्षिप्रम् लक्ष्मणेह शुभेक्षण
कर्तव्यः शास्त्रदृष्टो हि विधिर्दर्ममनुस्मर || २-५६-२३
Verse 23.
"Oh, large-eyed Lakshmana! Killing the antelope quickly, bring it here. The prescribed rite according to scriptural point of view indeed is to be performed. Keep in mind the sacred obligation."
How was Kaushalya the mother of Rama,whose father is unknown,treated by her husband ?
It reflects the state of the hindooo woman from time immemorial.She says that her husband treated her worse than all his wives and their servants ! She also says that Rama gave her no joy or happiness or satisfaction.dindooohindoo
Book II : Ayodhya Kanda - Book Of Ayodhya
Chapter 20
न द्ऱ्ष्ट पूर्वम् कल्याणम् सुखम् वा पति पौरुषे |
अपि पुत्रे विपश्येयम् इति राम आस्थितम् मया || २-२०-३८
Verse 38.
"Oh, Rama! I have not seen any happiness or prosperity earlier, while my husband is in power. I believed that I could see them at last when my son comes to power."
सा बहूनि अमनोज्ञानि वाक्यानि ह्ऱ्दयच्चिदाम् |
अहम् श्रोष्ये सपत्नीनाम् अवराणाम् वरा सती || २-२०-३९
Verse 39.
"I have to hear so many disagreeable words from my fellow-wives who are inferior to me and who pierce my heart with their words though I am a better and virtuous wife among them."
अत्यन्तनिगृहीतास्मि भर्तुर्नित्य्मतन्त्रिता |
परिवारेण कैकेय्या समा वाप्यथवाऽवरा || २-२०-४२
Verse 42.
"My husband always held me down, without giving me any independence and treat me equal to or even lower than the servants of Kaikeyi"
यदि पुत्र न जायेथा मम शोकाय राघव |
न स्म दुह्खम् अतः भूयः पश्येयम् अहम् अप्रजा || २-२०-३६
Verse 36.
"Oh, Rama! I would not have felt this much grief if I were childless .You are born only to produce sorrow to me."
Post a Comment